![]() |
ISCNI personnel are continuing to investigate the source and legitimacy of these images and information. Meanwhile, this page is posted without any claims on ISCNI's part, and may be modified as new information is acquired. The following text is essentially as provided by the original source.
Discussion: The graphics were supplied by a man named Curtis Brubaker to Seligman Productions in 10/88 for a show called ["UFO Coverup - Live"]. Brubaker made the claim that he placed the logos on the graphics. But, when Brubaker was asked the question as to why practically nobody saw them he had no answer. Brubaker later said that he received them from a source at Wright-Patterson AFB. Checking with two other sources, they both said that the "Alien" shown in the graphics was of the type kept at WPAFB up until 1982-83, at which point they were moved to "other locations" because of the publicity. This type "Alien" is also the same type that was recovered at both Roswell and the "Plains of San Agustin" in July of 1947. The one depicted in the Santilli film does not match anything described here and may very well be human. The reader must be aware that there was an extensive effort to try and trace the serial numbers on the graphics but that effort failed. Most readers are aware that the GAO just finished its report on Roswell looking at both classified and unclassified documents. And the GAO couldn't prove anything!)!?
and that, then proving anything in this area is extremely tough.
The graphics are a mixture of what appears to a model in some cases and artist illustrations in others. Most of them have serial numbers on them and the FTD etc logo. These graphics have been very carefully checked over seven years. The information ie "Anatomy" has been confirmed by a number of intelligence sources who, as you would expect, don't want to be named but are in a "need to know" basis at a high level: That's all that can be said: I [anonymous source] want to gauge the feedback if they are posted to see if it is worth the effort to proceed further.
The urgency is in the timing and the time is now. High level "intell" sources don't want to see a congressional [hearing? investigation?] on this and are really jumpy about GAO report. Santilli film is a good smoke screen whether the body is real or not. I hope this clears things up. Also, as far as I Know Falcon and Condor are legitimate sources and I have met both in person. There are other sources that they talk to as well.
Source reports that the following information came from an interview with an ex-VA (Veterans Administration) dental specialist in Dayton, OH, conducted in February 1995 by news reporter Carl Day of television station WDTN-Channel 2:
Air Force personnel visited VA hospital in Dayton during last week of October 1979, at which time the dental specialist conducted an examination of an alleged "alien" mandible cast or impression.
Dental specialist determined six basic things from the "mandible:"
COMMENT of source: Cast dates all the way back to 1951 at least. AF/OSI (Air Force Office of Special Investigations) did investigation on mandible in 1981-82 time frame checking for security leaks. Also, since mandible is at least 40+ years old and it underwent traumatic impact, then it could have come from one of the bodies recovered at Roswell [as] depicted in the graphics.
COMMENT of source: As of 09-15-95 further study of the "alien mandible" by Indiana University and others is taking place.
COMMENT of source: Graphic picture shows mandible overlayed on "alien" face. As the reader will note, it's a close fit.