Day 018 - 26 Jul 94 - Page 18
1 birds.
2 So, if you are carrying a bird by one leg and the bird
starts flapping whilst it is being carried out of the shed
3 or towards the crates where they are going to be -- which
are going to be used to be transported, then there is
4 tortion on the hip joint which causes it to dislocate.
That dislocation results in haemorrhage and the bird dies
5 from shock.
6 MR. RAMPTON: Before I come to the final question I want to ask
about this, we notice, if we look up the table, at the
7 "mean weight of dead birds" entry, do you see that? It
is about eight lines down the left hand column?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. That is the mean weight of the dead on arrivals that you
examined?
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. We see that plant D had birds which were relatively heavy
at 2.5 kilograms per bird; is that right?
12 A. Yes.
13 Q. Mean weight. But Sun Valley was slightly less heavy than
that at 2.45?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q. If you look down the column then, under D, you see that in
88 per cent of the cases for those relatively heavy birds
16 the cause of fatal trauma was dislocated or broken hip?
A. Yes.
17
Q. Whereas, as we noticed for birds almost as heavy at Sun
18 Valley, that cause was only the cause in six per cent of
the cases?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. Do you draw any conclusion, though you did not see it on
this occasion, about the care or the lack of care with
21 which the birds were gathered at Sun Valley?
A. Dr. Pattison, when I was speaking to him, volunteered
22 the comment that they put a lot of pressure on the
catching team to handle the birds in a considerate and
23 careful manner. I think this goes towards showing that is
likely to be the case.
24
Q. From the animal welfare point of view, do you feel that
25 these figures, so far as handling is concerned, are
creditable to Sun Valley or not?
26 A. I think they are commendable from the point of view of
hip dislocation. Commendable.
27
Q. Notwithstanding that, the incidence of dead on arrival at
28 Sun Valley was nearly, but not quite, it was nearly up to
the mean, was it not?
29 A. Correct.
30 Q. It was 200th of a per cent less; is that right?
A. Yes.