Day 039 - 20 Oct 94 - Page 09
1 Mr. Justice Bell's suggestion, 1 was evidence of rare not
2 serious reaction -- if you want to write these down?
3
4 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Do you want me to read them out as I have
5 them in my note?
6
7 MR. MORRIS: Yes.
8
9 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I have got 1, comparatively rare allergies
10 and not very serious; then a little later on -- this was
11 page 24 of the transcript -- Professor Walker added to that
12 "and reversible"; 2, very high dose only, which means
13 that a reaction showed only if a very high dose was given.
14 A. Reactions occurring?
15
16 Q. Very high dose only; then I went on to explain that by that
17 he meant that the reaction had only been demonstrated if a
18 very high dose had been given.
19 A. But the kinds of reactions falling under this heading
20 would still be acute.
21
22 Q. They would be reactions which are set out in the abstract,
23 or some of them, but he would say: "Yes, OK, that reaction
24 but only if you give a very high dose".
25
26 MR. MORRIS: For example, in animal testing.
27 A. That might include an acute reaction as well as a
28 tumour development in a group of animals.
29
30 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes. It might just be a rash or a tummy
31 upset, something like that.
32
33 MR. MORRIS: Any of the four categories basically.
34
35 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Then 3, was no satisfactory evidence of such
36 reactions; and merely to remind you that was particularly
37 what he said in relation to hyperactivity, anecdotal, no
38 satisfactory evidence. But those were the three
39 categories.
40
41 MR. MORRIS: I have a suggestion for a fourth category in the
42 light of Dr. Millstone's evidence ---
43
44 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes.
45
46 MR. MORRIS: -- which is, if you like, a double one. I have put
47 it as a double one because it is, or it could be 4,
48 I suppose, which is something that is a common reaction or
49 a serious reaction or, I suppose, a non-reversible
50 reaction -- the thing is if we are going to put a number,
51 we have to have a particular category.
52 A. Forgive me. I would not wish to be awkward, but my
53 reading of the literature is the range of different kinds
54 of reactions are really very diverse, and trying to force
55 them into this relatively narrow set of boxes might risk
56 misrepresenting it. I am more comfortable with taking the
57 evidence and characterising particular features, and if it
58 fits under one of these headings I am prepared to
59 acknowledge that, but if it not does fit under one of these
60 headings, I would not wish to pretend that it did.