Day 043 - 01 Nov 94 - Page 46
1 I am looking for is whether, in fact, amounts of money and
2 percentage of turnover reflect the actual working exposure.
3
4 MR. RAMPTON: Exactly.
5
6 (To the witness) What I was going to ask, because it
7 might help his Lordship in the end, is whether one can draw
8 any conclusions about whether, in fact, the exposure of
9 advertisements on television to children exceeds, as a
10 percentage of showing time, the percentage attributed to
11 children's advertising by budget?
12 A. Again, I am not so sure I can understand the question.
13 Can you say it one more time?
14
15 Q. I will ask a different question. Suppose you are able to
16 say that maybe 10 or 11 per cent of the expenditure is
17 devoted to children's advertising, is it safe to assume
18 that no more than 10 or 11 per cent of television exposure
19 is also devoted to children?
20 A. Yes, within the context of I think that you are saying
21 it. But, actually, if you look at gross rating points,
22 which is a measure of the frequency by which people watch
23 commercials over a period of time, I would say that if you
24 look at all of the commercials we go against adults and how
25 many times they are going to watch our commercials, our
26 super heavy user or a heavy user of McDonald's, and you
27 compare that to children, I would say that children was
28 about two thirds or a half of what the adult gross rating
29 points would be.
30
31 MR. RAMPTON: Yes. I am not sure that I quite know where that
32 leads.
33
34 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Let me just put a proposition to you, so that
35 you can knock it down. Would that mean, if it is wrong,
36 would that mean that although, for instance, you only spend
37 10 per cent of your television budget, let us say, on
38 advertising directed specifically at children, two thirds
39 of the television time covered by your ads is during
40 children's watching periods?
41 A. No. There will be a lot less commercials in children's
42 time period, if you talk about the commercials themselves,
43 but they have a bit of a higher rating against children,
44 because they seem to be more concentrated in this time
45 period, than they might have against 18 to 49s in an older
46 time period, or an older viewing time period.
47
48 I think the best way that I could try to explain it is if
49 you try to base this on the number of times someone will
50 watch your commercial. In an average four week period of
51 time, that what are trying to find out, or in an average
52 week, with the time you are trying to find out how many
53 times the average person in that category would watch a
54 commercial; and in the adult area, the average person
55 probably watches a particular McDonald's commercial three
56 or four times a week, and, in the kids' time period,
57 children's time period, they would watch it somewhere
58 around two or three times a week.
59
60 That is probably the best way that I can explain it.