Day 051 - 14 Nov 94 - Page 07


     
     1        all right -- the Defendants' expert on food poisoning who
     2        is a former Environmental Health Officer called Richard
     3        North visited three sites, I think, two restaurants or
     4        maybe it was two slaughterhouses and a restaurant, I do not
     5        know, and had done that by the end of August.
     6
     7        We wrote to the Defendants on 25th October asking for his
     8        report of those visits.  We have not had a response.  Food
     9        poisoning is coming up and if he is going to make a report
    10         -- if he is not, he cannot give evidence about it -- he
    11        should, please, produce it fairly soon so that we can send
    12        it to our experts for comment.  That is the first point.
    13
    14        The other point which I will mention, if I may, while I am
    15        on my feet is this:  If we are to have the argument on
    16        amendment and other interlocutory matters on 21st of this
    17        month, I would ask not that the Defendants serve a skeleton
    18        argument -- I am not asking for that -- but I would ask
    19        them, if they are going to make reference to any other
    20        parts of the transcripts than we have done, that we should
    21        have those before the weekend, preferably by Thursday 17th,
    22        plus a list of any authorities to which they intend to make
    23        reference.
    24
    25   MS. STEEL:   We will endeavour to do what we can but, to be
    26        honest, it may be that we are still working on it by the
    27        weekend.
    28
    29   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I would like you to do your best.  The other
    30        thing which I would like you to do, and it should be a
    31        useful exercise in deciding what you want to say on the
    32        applications to amend, is to put down in writing in so far
    33        as you do not accept the meaning -- let us just take
    34        nutrition for the moment -- which is in the Statement of
    35        Claim at the moment and/or the meaning which the Plaintiffs
    36        wish to have in the Statement of Claim by way of amendment,
    37        what you say the meaning would be to an ordinary reader of
    38        the leaflet.
    39
    40   MS. STEEL:  There is a meaning in our pleadings already.
    41
    42   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Yes.  I am not entirely confident it says
    43        just what you say "linked with" means and, moreover, what
    44        the leaflet as a whole means on this point.  I will read it
    45        again.  In fact, if you could give me the reference in the
    46        pleadings bundle?
    47
    48   MR. RAMPTON:  My Lord, it is tab 3 of the pleadings.
    49
    50   MS. STEEL:  It is on page 7 of that. 
    51 
    52   MR. RAMPTON:  Does your Lordship have it?  On page 7 it is true 
    53        there are some meanings set out.  Arguably, the meanings
    54        which are set out on page 7 do not go so far as ---
    55
    56   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Which tab are you in now?
    57
    58   MR. RAMPTON:  -- tab 3, my Lord, nutrition -- do not go as far
    59        as what is pleaded in the rest of the pleading.
    60

Prev Next Index