Day 070 - 20 Dec 94 - Page 03


     
     1   MR. RAMPTON:  No, my Lord.
     2
     3   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Let me just speak to the Defendants, then.
     4
     5   MS. STEEL:  I disagree with what Mr. Rampton said, that there
     6        was nothing more to be found in those documents that added
     7        to the sum total of knowledge to what was in Mr. Walker's
     8        statement.  There is more information in them, and we were
     9        trying to cross-examine Mr. Oakley on that.  We feel that
    10        this was just a tactical manoeuvre by the Plaintiffs and,
    11        as such, was an abuse of process.
    12
    13        We are actually concerned about quite a lot of the
    14        Plaintiffs' interruptions during our cross-examination.
    15
    16   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Can we deal with this, first of all?  The
    17        fact is that, in the situation which has arisen with regard
    18        to these documents, since they have come into your
    19        possession, whether or not they were actually privileged,
    20        it was for the Plaintiffs to make an application, if they
    21        so chose, to seek an order from me restraining you from
    22        using them in the trial and ordering you to return them if,
    23        having heard full argument, I thought fit to do so.  Since
    24        they have not taken that step, there is no issue but that
    25        you are entitled to put them to any valid use in the course
    26        of the trial.
    27
    28   MS. STEEL:  With respect, they served these documents,
    29        I believe, at the end of April or the beginning of May.
    30        They did not write to us for another month to ask us to
    31        give them back.  I brought this up in my opening speech,
    32        and they still did not apply.  We do feel that this was
    33        tactical manoeuvre to prevent our cross-examination of a
    34        witness.  We do feel quite perturbed at the course of their
    35        actions.
    36
    37   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Just pause a moment and think where are you
    38        going.  All I was trying to explain is that that has now
    39        gone.  If Mr. Rampton had made his application, I do not
    40        know what my decision would have been, but it has gone as a
    41        prospect of any restriction on your use of the documents in
    42        the case.  That is the first step.
    43
    44        What you have gone on to say, I am not going to comment on
    45        at this stage.  If you are making an application of some
    46        kind with regard to it, I will obviously consider that
    47        application and I will make whatever rule I think right and
    48        just to do, but I am not going to comment one way or
    49        another on what I might or might not think about what has
    50        happened. 
    51 
    52   MS. STEEL:   We will get legal advice on the position about the 
    53        manoeuvring.
    54
    55        Before we go on to anything else, I found a copy of the
    56        original headed notepaper from the US DA letter.
    57
    58   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Yes.  Just pause a moment.  What do you want
    59        to do about that?
    60

Prev Next Index