Day 075 - 17 Jan 95 - Page 22


     
     1        things were not.  That is the best way to approach it.  The
     2        thrust of Professor Ashworth's evidence and why he has been
     3        called is, effectively, this, that within the limitations
     4        of providing something like half their income from
     5        take-away sales, McDonald's behaves pretty well so far as
     6        environment/index.html">litter is concerned, putting in homely language.  It is any
     7        aspect of that which you should be challenging and
     8        testing.  You only need test that to which you think
     9        Professor Ashworth can particularly speak.
    10
    11   MR. MORRIS:  Yes.  (To the witness):  Professor Ashworth,
    12        McDonald's say they are going out and collecting from all
    13        their stores regularly environment/index.html">litter; would you say that, in your
    14        experience in your Group, but also in terms of your
    15        personal experience, using your common sense and
    16        observation, that McDonald's items of environment/index.html">litter are the
    17        largest single piece by piece source of environment/index.html">litter in urban
    18        areas in this country emanating from a single business?
    19        A.  No.
    20
    21   Q.   Can you name a company that has more environment/index.html">litter per item on the
    22        urban streets of this country?
    23        A.  If you -- I have to -----
    24
    25   Q.   Whether or they picked it up?
    26        A.  I have to qualify the answer because it depends where
    27        you are talking about.  I mean, if you are talking about
    28        the streets in general or in particular, if it is streets
    29        in general the answer is no, there are more cans than there
    30        are hamburger cases, there is more chewing gum than there
    31        are hamburger cases, there are more crisp packets than
    32        there are hamburger cases.  That is the sort of answer you
    33        want.  If you ask me about what the situation is within 25
    34        feet of the front of McDonald's, the answer will obviously
    35        be different.
    36
    37   Q.   You have mentioned more cans in general, more chewing gum
    38        in general, more crisp packets in general, but is there any
    39        single company you can identify that is the source of more
    40        items of environment/index.html">litter than McDonald's in urban areas?
    41        A.  I do not think it is possible to answer the question in
    42        the form in which you put it.  It depends where you are
    43        talking about.  Clearly, if you are talking about within a
    44        specific area, then the situation is different.
    45
    46   Q.   Let us say London.
    47
    48   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Can I put it this way because it may be just
    49        that you cannot give an answer.  If it were possible to go
    50        out now and take a satellite picture of every item of 
    51        environment/index.html">litter in the streets of the United Kingdom, can you say 
    52        whether there would be more McDonald's than there was 
    53        Walkers crisps or KP nuts?  Do you see what I mean?
    54        A.  Yes.
    55
    56   Q.   That is what you are being asked.  The first thing to say
    57        is whether you can answer the question.
    58        A.  I cannot answer it in the form in which it is put is
    59        the straight question.  But if you were to postulate such a
    60        question in the form in which you have put it, it is you

Prev Next Index