Day 105 - 16 Mar 95 - Page 07


     
     1        occurs in the production of minced beef and burgers; is
     2        that correct?
     3        A.  I have to discuss with you at some length what we mean
     4        by "inherent cross-contamination" or what we mean by
     5        "contamination".
     6
     7   Q.   Rather than separate pieces and kept separate pieces of
     8        meat, the burger production requires and the minced beef
     9        requires the mixing up of large amounts of cuts and
    10        grinding it up, grinding the surface into the middle, and
    11        you would recognise, would you not, that -----
    12
    13   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I think you have thrown him with the "cross",
    14        you see.  (To the witness):  What is being put to you is
    15        that if you have food products which are made of minced
    16        meat, the risk of contamination, particularly to what is
    17        the inside of the patty, and the spreading of organisms
    18        throughout a mix may present risks which your steak, or
    19        something like that, with surface contamination does not
    20        present, and may also present risks related to inadequate
    21        cooking which are not so apparent when it is just the
    22        surface of the meat which may be contaminated with
    23        pathogenic micro organisms?
    24        A.  Yes, it is always necessary to cook meat thoroughly,
    25        and if the micro organisms are mixed in with the rest of
    26        the meat, clearly, the ones in the middle need more cooking
    27        time.  But, given correct temperature control, it is by no
    28        means certain that there are any more micro organisms just
    29        because the surface ones have been spread around in the
    30        meat.
    31
    32   MR. MORRIS:  Yes, but not only spread around in terms of inside
    33        the volume of that particular patty or whatever, but is it
    34        not also the case that if one carcass or one cut is
    35        contaminated, then by batching that with 200 or 300 other
    36        cuts and grinding the whole lot up, you are guaranteeing
    37        that the contamination will be widely spread amongst
    38        possibly tens of thousands of individual food portions?
    39
    40   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  What do you say about that?
    41        A.  Well, I say, yes, whenever you mix products, you are
    42        going to get a mixture of whatever is there.  I must say
    43        that that is a general comment which applies to a small
    44        butcher's shop or a large organisation.  I must add that it
    45        is important to distinguish, particularly seeing that we
    46        have talked and may well talk again about HACCP because it
    47        is so crucial, that it is vital to distinguish between a
    48        hazard which may be theoretical, it may be real, it may be
    49        all of those things, and distinguish between that and the
    50        risk that is involved in that hazard.  In other words, a 
    51        hazard could be extremely low risk.  I have reservations 
    52        about mixing the terms -- never mind the meat -- 
    53        "contamination", "hazard" or "risk" because, in my view,
    54        it is extremely important to bear in mind the real risk
    55        that is involved.
    56
    57        Now, to return to "bulking", I think that is the phrase
    58        that would be used in a large organisation, bulking meat
    59        together clearly -- to repeat myself -- mixes into that
    60        bulk container whatever is present in the component parts.

Prev Next Index