Day 110 - 29 Mar 95 - Page 18
1
2 MS. STEEL: I think it was 6th February.
3
4 MR. MORRIS: Yes, I have 6th February. It certainly was
5 discussed on 6th February.
6
7 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Let us leave it there for the moment. I will
8 try to find it but I think it was mentioned after that.
9 I assume it may have been mentioned some time during the
10 week when I gave my ruling which, I think, was Monday, 27th
11 February.
12
13 Mr. Rampton, I am not going to enquire any further into the
14 question of Mr. Long and Mr. Tyler.
15
16 MR. RAMPTON: I did not expect your Lordship would. I said what
17 I did because I am not going to be silent as I was during
18 the evidence of Mrs. Druce. In fact, Mr. Morris is quite
19 wrong about the need for cross-examination of witnesses who
20 portray their lack of qualifications and expertise out of
21 their own mouths in-chief, then I do not have to
22 cross-examine.
23
24 What I am concerned with is the waste of McDonald's time
25 and the waste of McDonald's money. So, I am encouraging
26 the Defendants to stick to relevant evidence. If they do
27 not, I will interject.
28
29 MR. JUSTICE BELL: If there is any objection, I will rule on it
30 at the time. I do not think there is anything further
31 I can say about that now. Was there anything further you
32 wanted to say in relation to employment, Brazil or
33 Mr. Nicholson?
34
35 MR. RAMPTON: No, my Lord. I will reserve my position on that.
36 We will see what comes out in the wash when the 14 days are
37 up and we will see the Defendants' list of witnesses that
38 are coming to court.
39
40 MR. MORRIS: We have a list of witnesses coming to court
41 already. Their statements were disclosed two years ago.
42
43 MR. RAMPTON: My Lord, the other thing that remains, I would
44 like to deal with Brazil as soon as possible for reasons
45 your Lordship has mentioned. If it is going to be
46 disallowed for the various reasons which I have not yet
47 addressed your Lordship about, then let us get it out of
48 the way as soon as possible. If any part is going to be
49 allowed in with discovery implications, then I should need
50 time to see whether any relevant documents exist or not
51 and, if so, get them to this country, so the sooner that is
52 dealt with the better.
53
54 My Lord, Mr. Nicholson is the only remaining witness
55 I wanted to mention. The suggestion was made yesterday,
56 I think, because the Defendants felt uneasy about having to
57 prepare cross-examine him on both parts of his evidence,
58 that is to say employment and publication.
59
60 The suggestion was made by the Defendants that the