Day 147 - 04 Jul 95 - Page 06
1 of practice, once the trial has started, should be in
2 chambers rather than in open court?
3
4 I have freely referred to them as interlocutory matters.
5 I suppose interlocutory matters are actually matters
6 anywhere between the commencement of the action and the
7 commencement of the trial, are they not?
8
9 MR. RAMPTON: No, my Lord.
10
11 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Otherwise one would just describe them as
12 procedural.
13
14 MR. RAMPTON: No, my Lord, they are not, with respect.
15 Interlocutory matters are in general matters which are,
16 yes, part of the proceedings, but interlocutory matters are
17 matters which are decided, I would have said -- and I have
18 not had any notice of this application and, therefore, as
19 usual, Mr. Atkinson and I are taken by surprise.
20
21 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I am quite happy to give you some time,
22 because I can see that it has some potential importance.
23
24 MR. RAMPTON: Yes, it does.
25
26 MR. JUSTICE BELL: For instance, what I decide today may
27 therefore be a precedent, one way or another, for similar
28 situations in the future. Although I am anxious to get on
29 with the case, since we have, as it happens, the rest of
30 today and tomorrow set aside for the argument, if you want
31 some time to research, having, as it were, had no reason to
32 foresee that the matter would be raised again this morning,
33 certainly you shall have it.
34
35 MR. RAMPTON: Of course I did not; as usual, it was kept until
36 we were in court. Can I just draw your attention -----
37
38 MS. STEEL: Can I just object? This was raised by Mr. Rampton
39 last week. He asked for the court to go into chambers. We
40 were given absolutely no notice. It is not us who is
41 keeping things up our sleeves; it is Mr. Rampton.
42
43 MR. RAMPTON: Can I draw your attention, my Lord, first of all,
44 to page 565 in part 1 of the White Book? This is part of
45 Order 32, and the note at 32/1-6/3:
46
47 "Interlocutory applications - normal procedure. Both in
48 the Ch.D and Q.B.D. interlocutory applications are normally
49 by summons in Chambers. The former practice in the Ch.D.
50 of making such applications by motion has been much
51 restricted and should only be adopted in very special
52 cases."
53
54 My Lord, I do not see anything special about this case.
55
56 MR. JUSTICE BELL: What are interlocutory proceedings, though?
57
58 MR. RAMPTON: Then I ask your Lordship to look at volume 2 of
59 the White Book. This fortifies what I was about to say.
60 Sorry, my Lord, I am misleading your Lordship. It is in