Day 147 - 04 Jul 95 - Page 23


     
     1
     2        The crux of this, of course, which the Defendants hate to
     3        recognise, is that it is McDonald's who are paying for them
     4        to have both the transcripts and CaseView.  That offer to
     5        pay for CaseView and the transcripts was made on two bases
     6        when this case began:  first, that it was thought (and
     7        perhaps rightly) that it would lead to a more orderly and,
     8        indeed, a fairer trial if they had the same facilities as
     9        we did; but the second basis on which that offer was made
    10        was that the Defendants would use that facility in good
    11        faith.  Now, that they have not done.
    12
    13        I remain 100 per cent unmoved and unconvinced by anything
    14        Ms. Steel or Mr. Morris have said about this, for the very
    15        good reason that they have given no explanation to us -- it
    16        is not a matter for your Lordship; it is a matter for us --
    17        why it is that the McLibel Support campaign feels able to
    18        print on Internet (and elsewhere, for that matter) large
    19        chunks of selective quotations which they expressly say are
    20        taken directly from the court transcripts.
    21
    22        Until the Defendants are willing to satisfy us that the
    23        McLibel Support campaign have not had the transcripts from
    24        the Defendants, we remain of the view that they have abused
    25        our generosity, that they are in no position to complain
    26        about the difficulty which this may place them in in
    27        pursuing this case.
    28
    29        I proposed yesterday that we would certainly reconsider the
    30        matter if we could have an undertaking from the Defendants,
    31        an express undertaking -- and I now say in writing -- that
    32        they will keep the transcripts to themselves.  It would
    33        help in our believing the validity of that undertaking if
    34        they could explain how it is that the McLibel Support
    35        campaign, apparently, is able to take quotes from these
    36        distorted reports from the court transcripts.
    37
    38        That is a matter between the Defendants and my clients,
    39        McDonald's.  If the Defendants are willing to swallow their
    40        pride and go down that road, then we will certainly
    41        seriously reconsider the matter.  They have shown no sign
    42        of being willing to do that, despite my invitation to them
    43        last night.
    44
    45   MS. STEEL:  I do not think Mr. Morris has actually finished.
    46        I thought that -----
    47
    48   MR. RAMPTON:  I am very sorry.  I thought that he had.
    49
    50   MS. STEEL:  He was being asked about the cost of provision of 
    51        transcripts. 
    52 
    53   MR. RAMPTON:  I have a good deal more to say, so I will sit
    54        down.
    55
    56   MS. STEEL:   I thought there was an enquiry about the cost of
    57        provision of transcripts, and that was why Mr. Rampton got
    58        up, because Mr. Morris had not finished what he was going
    59        to say.
    60

Prev Next Index