Day 148 - 05 Jul 95 - Page 22


     
     1        that information by going to individual stores and I do and
     2        taking a look at it."
     3        Those are termination reasons.  So it does not strike -----
     4
     5   MR. MORRIS:  That would reinforce my view.
     6
     7   MR. RAMPTON:  No, my Lord, may I finish?  It does not ring any
     8        bells that he ever said anything which would suggest that
     9        they keep individual records for length of stay, save in a
    10        personnel file, which they might well do.
    11
    12   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Thank you for the reference.  If anyone finds
    13        any other references, I would be grateful if they would
    14        give them to me and I will look them up.
    15
    16   MR. MORRIS:  It does seem to me that reference certainly
    17        indicates that each store has some record of reasons for
    18        leaving, not in individual personnel files but as a store.
    19        Whether that indicates the length of time as well, we know
    20        that the Company in its Operations Manual evaluates the
    21        reasons for leaving given by employees.
    22
    23        So, it implies there is some kind of store monitoring of
    24        reasons for leaving, and we believe Mr. Beavers can only be
    25        referring to that kind of information on a store level.  He
    26        was implying it was Company level, but certainly store
    27        level for length of stay as well.
    28
    29        So I think that, in the light of that, maybe the easiest
    30        thing would be to say if that could be done for, say,
    31        Company owned stores in the Chicago area.  I do not know if
    32        Chicago is a highly franchised area or a highly McOpco
    33        area, but I personally do not think it makes any difference
    34        but, just to save argument on that, McOpco stores in the
    35        Chicago area.
    36
    37        Of course, if that exercise was done, then McDonald's would
    38        themselves benefit from it if they had not got that
    39        information in any other easily available form.
    40
    41   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Unless you have more to add in relation to
    42        that, your other item of discovery on 4 is pesticide and
    43        hormone residue documents referred to by Dr. Gomez Gonzales
    44         ---
    45
    46   MR. MORRIS:  Yes.
    47
    48   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  -- which, I assume, tell me if I am wrong,
    49        depends upon you getting leave to amend in relation to
    50        pesticide and hormones, which is a matter which you want to 
    51        leave over for the moment. 
    52 
    53   MR. MORRIS:  I do not see why the disclosure should be reliant
    54        on a specific pleading because evidence has already been
    55        given by McDonald's own witness, and it is obviously a
    56        matter that is relevant.  It is a direct reference in the
    57        London Greenpeace fact sheet to pesticides and hormones,
    58        and Dr. Gomez Gonzales was asked, well, he gave evidence on
    59        day 92.
    60

Prev Next Index