Day 157 - 18 Jul 95 - Page 05


     
     1        because that would be a use of the recording.
     2
     3   MR. MORRIS:  There is no -----
     4
     5   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  What is suggested is that if I give you leave
     6        I put a condition that the recording be used only for the
     7        purposes of your conduct of this action.
     8
     9   MS. STEEL:   I think that the position taken by the Plaintiffs
    10        is a blatant attempt to censor us from talking about the
    11        case.  There is no restriction on the use that they put to
    12        the transcripts that they have.  They have talked to the
    13        press about what has gone on in this court.  There is
    14        absolutely no reason why we should be restricted from
    15        talking to whoever we want about what has gone on in this
    16        court.  If we breach any laws, then the appropriate action
    17        can be taken under any laws that we breach.
    18
    19        This is a completely unnecessary restriction, completely
    20        one sided.  As I say, it is just an attempt by the
    21        Plaintiffs to try and stop us talking about what is going
    22        on in the case, then they get free reign to say whatever
    23        they want.  That can hardly be in the interests of justice.
    24
    25   MR. MORRIS:  I think regarding the publishing of recorded sound
    26        -- this is covered by 9(1)(b) -- and we are saying that we
    27        are only using the recorded sound for our records, for our
    28        legal purposes of this hearing and, therefore, there is
    29        absolutely no need for any -- the recorded sound is dealt
    30        with by 9(1)(b) completely ---
    31
    32   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I know it is.
    33
    34   MR. MORRIS:  -- a transcript of any hearing is another question
    35        which we will come to later; I do not want to do it now.
    36
    37   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  What I am inviting you to address me on (and
    38        Ms. Steel has addressed me on) is whether I should impose
    39        any condition if I grant leave for the tape-recording under
    40        section 9(2), and the condition Mr. Rampton has suggested
    41        is that any recording should only be used for the purposes
    42        of the conduct of the case in court.
    43
    44        If I impose such a condition you would be in breach of it
    45        if you used any transcript which you made of the recording
    46        for use other than for the purposes of the conduct of the
    47        case in court because, although it would then be a
    48        transcript, it would be a transcript made from the
    49        recording and that would mean that the recording had been
    50        used for that purpose. 
    51 
    52        Ms. Steel has the point and has addressed me on that.  If 
    53        she wants to add anything to what she has just said or you
    54        want to add anything, then please do so.
    55
    56   MS. STEEL:  Yes.  I just want to make it clear, I do understand
    57        that we are not allowed to broadcast the tape itself, and I
    58        was not referring to that.
    59
    60   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  You cannot broadcast the tape, come what may,

Prev Next Index