Day 163 - 25 Sep 95 - Page 12
1 actions are tried by judge and jury and the judge decides
2 whether the words are capable of bearing the defamatory
3 meaning. It is not until the jury return their verdict
4 that one can work out what they have made of the meaning
5 necessarily, but here you have a judge alone, so I can
6 decide along the way.
7
8 I think this is probably apparent that I have been thinking
9 about it over the vacation. My own view is, as presently
10 advised under Ord. 33, r. 3, that I can decide what the
11 meaning is, that it would carry considerable potential
12 advantage, not only in the system of the disposal of your
13 application to strike out, but, if that fails, deciding,
14 you, Ms. Steel and Mr. Rampton, who is the court embodiment
15 of the First and Second Plaintiffs, what further evidence
16 is required on nutrition.
17
18 If you and Ms. Steel think that that is a sensible course
19 to take, then what I suggest is a few days hence (so you
20 have had time to think about any further arguments) we have
21 argument on it and I will give my ruling.
22
23 MR. MORRIS: Maybe we could do that this week, but probably not
24 tomorrow.
25
26 MR. JUSTICE BELL: No. I am not going to rush you into it.
27 Just let me find something. What I will do is I will
28 decide the meaning unless, Mr. Rampton, any authority to
29 the contrary occurs, which it does not look as if it will.
30
31 MR. RAMPTON: I do not know of any.
32
33 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I will take a break now to quarter to 12.
34 What I would like you to do, if you look at page 6, line
35 39, of CaseView which you can sit in court and look at,
36 there is something I said there which started off: "If it
37 means". What I would like you to copy down is the meaning
38 I put forward there, so that when you argue about meaning
39 you have verbatim what I had in mind as a possible meaning.
40
41 MS. STEEL: Can I ask a question? I do not know whether this
42 is appropriate but, for the purposes of preparing an
43 argument, is it possible to know when you first came into
44 this case what was the first thing you read about the case
45 or what was the first thing you heard?
46
47 MR. JUSTICE BELL: In what way?
48
49 MS. STEEL: About what the issues were.
50
51 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I am not sure I can recall but, to the best
52 of my recollection, it was reading the pleadings and the
53 leaflet itself.
54
55 MS. STEEL: Did you read the pleadings before the leaflet?
56
57 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes, certainly. I say "certainly" because
58 one always read the pleadings, first of all, and the
59 Statement of Claim sets out large parts, but not all, of
60 the leaflet itself because it sets out the words which are