Day 165 - 27 Sep 95 - Page 10


     
     1
     2   MR. MORRIS:  It is meant to be our argument.
     3
     4   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  No, it is not.  If you recall, the position
     5        is this:  Ms. Steel made her application for discovery of
     6        these matters.  Mr. Rampton replied to it or answered it.
     7        You will then have an opportunity to reply to his answer
     8        and that will be the end of the argument.  Mr. Rampton has
     9        stood up again this morning because we did not have Thorpe
    10        yesterday.  When he has finished his argument on that, then
    11        you will have your right of reply as the makers of the
    12        original application for discovery.
    13
    14   MR. MORRIS:  He did say he had finished his argument and we were
    15        starting to reply and now Mr. Rampton wants to come back
    16        before we have actually -----
    17
    18   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  No.  Mr. Rampton was still on his feet when
    19        Ms. Steel said something which Mr. Rampton now wants to
    20        deal with.  Just stay calm.  You will have ample
    21        opportunity to reply in due course.
    22
    23   MR. RAMPTON:  My Lord, I am just waiting for an answer to the
    24        interrogatories.  I will only give your Lordship one
    25        example otherwise it will take forever.  My Lord, on page 2
    26        of Mr. Clare's statement -- I do not know if your Lordship
    27        still has that -- at paragraphs 8 and 9 he says that there
    28        was a meeting of the group at 6 Ensley Street on 22nd
    29        February 1990.  He says that amongst other people Ms. Steel
    30        was there and that the anti-McDonald's fight was discussed
    31        amongst other things.
    32
    33        On 3rd November 1992 (which is a lot closer to
    34        22nd February 1990 than we are today) interrogatories were
    35        served on Ms. Steel which asked the question:  "Did you not
    36        on" (this is interrogatory No. 34) "22nd February 1990 or
    37        on some other date, and if so when, attend an open meeting
    38        of London Greenpeace at 5 Ensley Street, London?"  Answer
    39        by Ms. Steel -- this is unequivocal; it is a one word
    40        answer -- "No."  That answer was served on 1st March 1993
    41        on oath.  My Lord, that is just an example.
    42
    43        I will add this -- then I will sit down because I have,
    44        I think, finished now -- that I am not complaining that
    45        I have not so far had supplementary witness statements from
    46        the Defendants on these issues.  However, it may assist the
    47        Defendants when they come to make such supplementary
    48        statements as, in my submission, they must in good time
    49        before the enquiry agents give evidence, to look back at
    50        these answers to interrogatories made, as I say, much 
    51        nearer the time of the events than we are now. 
    52 
    53   MS. STEEL:   I want to come back on something but I would like,
    54        if it is possible, to have two minutes to speak to
    55        Mr. Morris outside court?
    56
    57   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Yes, I will come back at ten past 11.
    58
    59                       (Short Adjournment)
    60

Prev Next Index