Day 177 - 26 Oct 95 - Page 22


     
     1             that it could not really be strengthening and
     2             that the claim for its use on this ground was
     3             positively absurd, it was held that such a
     4             statement imputed either dishonesty or
     5             fraudulent incapacity in the conduct of the
     6             plaintiff's business, and was therefore
     7             defamatory."
     8
     9        Then comes the example of one of the cases we have in the
    10        bundle.
    11
    12             "On the other hand, an advertisement cautioning
    13             the public that the plaintiff's 'self-acting
    14             tallow syphons and lubricators wasted the
    15             tallow' was held not to be a libel on the
    16             plaintiff either generally or in the way of his
    17             trade, but only a reflection on the goods sold
    18             by him which was not actionable without proof of
    19             (malice and of) special damage."
    20
    21             My Lord, we believe that to succeed in this case on
    22        this part of the leaflet, on the argument today, we have to
    23        persuade your Lordship that the words printed there in the
    24        context of the leaflet as a whole impute to McDonald's one
    25        or other or more of those four categories of misconduct by
    26        a trader which I enumerated a moment ago.  It would be
    27        idle, perhaps, to state that we do not have any difficulty
    28        doing that.  But that is what we believe the principle to
    29        be.
    30
    31        So, whatever precise meaning those words bear, to meat in a
    32        sense the first part of what your Lordship was putting this
    33        morning, which is are those words in context defamatory at
    34        all, the answer must plainly be that they are.  Whether
    35        they impute incompetence, inefficiency, negligence,
    36        recklessness or dishonesty -- and, as we would say,
    37        certainly the latter two and probably, most forcibly, the
    38        last, dishonesty -- they are defamatory.
    39
    40        So the next question which your Lordship must also decide
    41        at this stage of the case is: what is the actual meaning
    42        which those words in their context would convey to the
    43        ordinary reasonable man in the street; and when I say man
    44        in the street, for once it is meant literally; at any rate,
    45        for some of the readers of this leaflet.  I will come back
    46        to him and try and bring him to life perhaps a little later
    47        on.
    48
    49        What I would like to do next is just to whizz through the
    50        authorities. 
    51 
    52   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Shall we take the break I promised there?  Do 
    53        you want the ten minutes rather than the five?
    54
    55   MS. STEEL:   Yes.  I have quite a few bits tht I did not manage
    56        to get down.  Thank you.
    57
    58                          (Short Adjournment)
    59
    60   MR. RAMPTON:  My Lord, just before I start on the authorities,

Prev Next Index