Day 200 - 12 Dec 95 - Page 17


     
     1        is your Lordship's view, we must necessarily accept it and
     2        we will recall him.  It does not mean, however, that
     3        I accept at this stage, or will accept at the end of the
     4        case, that evidence as to frequency or quantity has in
     5        fact ----
     6
     7   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I understand that.  In recalling him -- I say
     8        "recalling" him -- in bringing him back into the witness
     9        box so that cross-examination can continue, you are not
    10        showing any sign of relenting from the argument which you
    11        have just put, but there we are.  What I am not going to do
    12        is give anything which is an inferential ruling, let alone
    13        an express one, on whether I think you are right in your
    14        argument.  That being the case, it seems to me, if the
    15        Defendants want to carry on cross-examining Mr. Fairgrieve,
    16        they ought to be allowed to do so.
    17
    18   MR. RAMPTON:  If your Lordship says so, that must happen
    19        necessarily.  My Lord, I state the argument now, although
    20        I anticipate or, at least, I know, I think, what your
    21        Lordship's response would be, but it is best to state it
    22        now; the same goes for Professor Crawford for the same
    23        reason.  If the Defendants cannot get over the first hurdle
    24        of showing that food is intrinsically unhealthy because it
    25        simply does not have the properties alleged in this
    26        meaning, then of course it must follow that the supposed
    27        consequential risk of cancer is out of reach as well.
    28
    29   MS. STEEL:  I did not understand that -- "intrinsically
    30        unhealthy because it does not have the properties alleged
    31        in this meaning"?
    32
    33   MR. RAMPTON:  Yes, if it is not intrinsically unhealthy, and the
    34        reason why it is not intrinsically unhealthy is that it
    35        does not have the properties described in this
    36        meaning  -----
    37
    38   MS. STEEL:  Which properties are you talking about?
    39
    40   MR. RAMPTON:  The properties of -----
    41
    42   MR. MORRIS:  Being high in ----
    43
    44   MR. RAMPTON:  No, no, the properties of making your diet high in
    45        fat if you eat it.  If it is incapable of having that
    46        quality as food, then, of course, it is incapable of
    47        incurring the risk of cancer or heart disease as food.
    48        Since both those conditions, if they are incurred as a
    49        result of eating food, are incurred only as a result of
    50        eating too much of it as a diet and failing to eat 
    51        sufficient quantities of other things to balance. 
    52 
    53   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  But do they not balance against each other?
    54        I mean, I looked at various tables of meals which, I think
    55        it was suggested, someone might eat throughout the week
    56        with, I think, in some of them a McDonald's meal arriving
    57        once a week -- did it also arrive once a day in some of the
    58        tables?
    59
    60   MR. RAMPTON:  Yes, of course we did all that, but we did it all

Prev Next Index