Day 243 - 02 May 96 - Page 31


     
     1        another, but it seems to me it is another thing for any
     2        party to be relying on a particular document -- or this is
     3        what I most in mind, a computer printout -- thinking that
     4        it speaks for itself only to find when it is too late to
     5        call any evidence that there is some fundamental objection
     6        to it being taken into account.
     7
     8   MR. RAMPTON:  That is certainly right and, whether it is argued
     9        or not, we must have any objections that the Defendants
    10        have before we all go away because if there are any
    11        objections then, for example, a computer printout generated
    12        at some time in the past by an unknown person, though I
    13        am fairly confident that we could, if put to it, formally
    14        prove the documents, all the documents which we have put
    15        forward, even if they have not already been proved, in some
    16        cases, it will take a considerable amount of time and
    17        effort and we would have to set that in motion unless
    18        I could persuade your Lordship it did not need doing.  It
    19        would have to be set in motion sooner rather than later.
    20
    21        We did originally ask the defendant -- we sent our list to
    22        them, I cannot remember when, but in the earlier part of
    23        this year and asked them to respond by the 16th April.
    24        They have not done so I am not complaining about that save
    25        in so far as eventually it may put us in an impossible
    26        difficulty.
    27
    28   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  What would seem to me to be sensible would be
    29        to say that on any day where a gap appears after the legal
    30        vacation (which ends on 3rd June) I will ask Ms. Steel and
    31        Mr. Morris to say which documents are admitted on
    32        Mrs. Brinley-Codd's list and to which there is a
    33        fundamental objection.  Do you remember I suggested you do
    34        your best to provide a similar list?
    35
    36   MS. STEEL:   We have not forgotten about that but we have not
    37        had the time to do it and that is all.
    38
    39   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I am saying "after the legal vacation"
    40        because that may give you some time, if you have not
    41        completed your work on it, to be ready.
    42
    43   MR. RAMPTON:  The only other thing ----
    44
    45   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  You should do your best to deal with
    46        Mrs. Brindley-Codd's list but you owe it to yourselves to
    47        raise any document which you think is important to your
    48        case where it is not proved by a witness and you want to
    49        make sure that it is either accepted as common ground,
    50        agreed or admitted so that you know that you can rely upon 
    51        it and not find out too late that it is not actually 
    52        admissible as proof of its contents. 
    53
    54   MS. STEEL:  If it is a McDonald's own document, do we still need
    55        to do that or can we not say, "Well, if they have admitted
    56        something in their own document, we can use it against
    57        them"?
    58
    59   MR. MORRIS:  You did say that at one time.
    60

Prev Next Index