Day 253 - 21 May 96 - Page 03
1 is an anteriorum; there are only 2 matters I want to refer
2 to.
3
4 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I would like to know what they are because if
5 it is just bringing in parts which I have excluded, I am
6 not very attracted by it. So I would like you to tell me
7 what the parts are.
8
9 MR. RAMPTON: My Lord, I am in this difficulty, I perceive.
10 Mr. Morris -- I am not talking about Ms. Steel's
11 cross-examination, I confine myself to Mr. Morris --
12 perhaps the easiest thing is, I have taken the liberty, and
13 I say I am not sure if I am allowed to do it, I have taken
14 the liberty of copying four pages from yesterday's
15 transcript, which contain two passages which I would submit
16 do give rise to a right in me to re-examine. (Handed).
17
18 My Lord, they both concern passages read from The World
19 Health Organisation Report which Mr. Morris asked Professor
20 Naismith about. The first is the one I mentioned
21 yesterday, which starts at the bottom of page 55. That is
22 at the back of that little clip. It is the last page but
23 one, I think, at line 55, and then Mr. Morris read out the
24 passage.
25
26 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Let me read it again (Pause).
27
28 MR. RAMPTON: There is a misprint at the top of page 56, the
29 last word.
30
31 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes.
32
33 MR. RAMPTON: My Lord, that line of questioning, and I will just
34 refer your Lordship to the other one because it is the same
35 topic, which is at the bottom of page 53, which I think is
36 the first page in the transcript, starting at line 51, and
37 ending at the bottom of the page.
38
39 MR. MORRIS: Sorry, at the bottom of what page?
40
41 MR. RAMPTON: Page 53.
42
43 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes.
44
45 MR. RAMPTON: As I see it, the only purpose of those questions
46 can be to fuel a suggestion that the introduction of
47 McDonald's food in developing countries is a bad idea on
48 health grounds, and the further suggestion that Professor
49 Naismith has supported that suggestion. I lay emphasis on
50 those last words because this arose in cross-examination,
51 as a submission which the Defendants can make, for better
52 or worse, at the end of the case.
53
54 Faced with that, since it arose in cross-examination, and
55 the implication that Professor Naismith would, if asked,
56 have supported that suggestion, I believe I have no choice
57 but to ask him whether he does or does not agree with that
58 implied suggestion.
59
60 MR. JUSTICE BELL: How far does that involve you going?