Day 285 - 23 Oct 96 - Page 16
1 the questionnaires. So Edward Oakley on day 64, page 3,
2 line 45, said that the policy meant finished product, that
3 they bought their finished products locally, and he is the
4 purchasing manager for Northern Europe.
5
6 But Dr. Gonzalez on day 68, page 6, line 27, said the
7 product is beef in general. And these are the two most
8 senior people, probably, dealing with this issue in
9 terms -- well, Dr. Gonzalez on a global level and Edward
10 Oakley for Northern Europe. So they do not seem to know
11 what it means, and indeed we have heard that McDonald's in
12 the UK have received beef from not only European countries
13 but also from Brazil. And if I remember rightly with
14 David Walker, he was talking about beef imports from the
15 USA or Canada as well. I am not a hundred percent sure on
16 that. I have not had a chance to check. And I think that
17 is raw materials.
18
19 We have imports from Australia, Taiwan, Brazil to
20 Switzerland, to McDonald's suppliers in Switzerland, that
21 Dr. Gonzalez had seen. Japan was getting beef from USA,
22 Australia and New Zealand. It was Dr. Gonzalez, day 67,
23 page 50, line 22. And these are just examples. Dr.
24 Gonzalez said he had never heard of Brazilian beef
25 being... Well, I think he changed his evidence as it went
26 along. I am not quite sure, I have not got all the
27 references on this. Hopefully, you may have made notes
28 that would reveal that.
29
30 But I think his initial reaction was, there was no
31 Brazilian beef exported anywhere else for McDonald's use.
32 In fact, that would, of course, correspond to the letter
33 in 1982 which recognised that the export of Brazilian beef
34 was a causal factor in destruction of Amazonian forest and
35 rainforest, Amazonian forest. Unbeknown to Dr. Gonzalez,
36 Brazilian beef was exported to the UK the following year
37 after that letter was written, saying that they had a
38 policy not to do it.
39
40 And this is where we get to a problem with McDonald's
41 witnesses and hearsay, because Dr. Gonzalez gives evidence
42 that it could not have happened, he had never heard
43 anything like that. But, for a start, he is relying on
44 other people informing him and, secondly, I can't remember
45 the date that he started work, Mr. Rampton can correct me
46 if I am wrong, but something like 1991. I might be wrong
47 on that. It seems to me, this is a general comment, that
48 McDonald's witnesses are keen to state grand points as
49 fact, and state them to the public as well, when they
50 cannot even possibly know if they are true or not. Of
51 course, if they make an admission, then that is highly
52 relevant.
53
54 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes, can I just make one point. It is not
55 to gainsay what you are saying here. Admissions against
56 interest are admissible. One still has to judge whether
57 they are true. It may be more likely that they are true
58 because it may be said, as a general principle, people do
59 not admit things against their interests unless they are
60 true. But that is not the answer to the question every