Day 301 - 15 Nov 96 - Page 20
1 mostly women. There is not really much to say about that
2 really. Obviously, a lot of McDonald's part-timers are
3 male, but it does not really make any difference because
4 the unions generally do not show much interest in the
5 problems of part-timers for reasons that we have heard --
6 difficulty in recruiting, all that kind of stuff, the rapid
7 turnover.
8
9 "A recent survey of workers in burger restaurants found
10 that eighty percent said they needed union help over pay
11 and conditions." I think Mr. Pearson said about this,
12 sympathies, and you have got positive response when
13 leafleting outside McDonald's, as regards the union help.
14 And it goes on to say, "Another difficulty is that the
15 kitchen trade has a high proportion of workers from ethnic
16 minority groups who, with little chance of getting work
17 elsewhere, are wary of being sacked, as many have been, for
18 attempting union organisation."
19
20 Now, this "... little chance of getting work elsewhere"
21 can be connected to the last sentence in this whole section
22 about the point being that people who are getting work in
23 low paid jobs are people who have little choice about
24 getting work elsewhere. That is obviously common sense, as
25 people do not voluntarily go for the lowest pay jobs unless
26 they have very little choice.
27
28 "... are wary of being sacked, as many have been, for
29 attempting union organisation." Again, we are still
30 talking about the kitchen trade as a whole. Union
31 organisation attempts have not exactly been encouraged by
32 McDonald's and have been vigorously fought, opposed,
33 discouraged and, in fact, within McDonald's own system are
34 illegal within the terms and conditions of the crew
35 handbook.
36
37 Then we go on the next sentence, "McDonald's have a policy
38 of preventing unionisation by getting rid of pro-union
39 workers." Unionisation can only take place, effectively,
40 by people at work communicating with each other, organising
41 themselves, having meetings, giving out leaflets to each
42 other, putting up notices, talking to outside third
43 parties, all of which McDonald's have a policy of
44 preventing. They are disciplinary offences and, indeed,
45 talking to an outside third party, as Mr. Nicholson said,
46 that would include unions, is a sackable offence. Summary,
47 sackable offence. So how anybody at McDonald's could
48 possibly, in this country or indeed anywhere else, without
49 an enormous amount of effort and laws protecting them,
50 effectively protecting them, unionise is impossible to
51 envisage because of McDonald's policies of preventing
52 unionisation, and as it is a summary, sackable offence to
53 communicate with trade unions about conditions at a store,
54 according to their head of personnel, and all the other
55 things that you would have to do.
56
57 It is all very well to say, as McDonald's have said, of
58 course they have a right to join a trade union as long as
59 they do not do anything about it, but the whole point about
60 unionisation, what we are talking about, union organisation