Day 301 - 15 Nov 96 - Page 46


     
     1   MR JUSTICE BELL:  I have made my point about pay.  So if you
     2        think there is any specific evidence which helps you on
     3        that, get me to note it down.
     4
     5   MR. MORRIS:   Well, you know, I think there is a general common
     6        knowledge on the effect of union recognition and
     7        representation on wage levels in different parts of the
     8        world.
     9
    10   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  All I am saying is, you are speaking to
    11        someone with no political bias one way or the other, but
    12        however that may have been some time ago, I don't know
    13        whether I can accept that that is so, or has been so in the
    14        economic situation which has prevailed for some years now.
    15        In any event, apart from making some general judgment of
    16        what seems to be common sense for me, I am anxious that I
    17        should not miss any positive evidence on the point, which
    18        is why I have raised it.
    19
    20   MS. STEEL:   Where do we go on this?  Surely, it must be a valid
    21        opinion, to hold the opinion that there is a benefit from
    22        union recognition in terms of wage levels.  I mean, there
    23        is a considerable proportion of the population do subscribe
    24        to that view.
    25
    26   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  It may be, but I have to look at what is
    27        justified in the sense of being true, I suppose.  That is
    28        why it is important to try and distinguish areas where fair
    29        comment is your defence and where justification is your
    30        defence, or where you say, "Quite apart from justification
    31        I have a defence of fair comment as well".  You see, I have
    32        to look at the terms of the leaflet, as well.  If the
    33        leaflet had had a little paragraph in it saying, "We
    34        believe that McDonald's employees would be better paid if
    35        they accepted union representation", then first of all,
    36        I doubt that would have been sued over and there could be
    37        no cause for complaint.  Of course that is a view someone
    38        is entitled to put forward.
    39
    40        But I have got to concentrate on what is defamatory here,
    41        and so far as unions are concerned, whatever you may
    42        believe perfectly genuinely about the improvements on
    43        union, that the sting of this leaflet so far as unions are
    44        concerned seems to me that it says McDonald's not only get
    45        rid of pro-union workers but have a policy of preventing
    46        unionisation by getting rid of pro-union workers and have
    47        sacked many employees for attempting union organisation.
    48
    49   MR. MORRIS:   Hang on, wait a minute. The leaflet does not say
    50        that at all.
    51
    52   MR JUSTICE BELL:   It does, it says at the top of the right hand
    53        column-----
    54
    55   MR. MORRIS:   I know Mr. Rampton is trying to weigh in, because
    56        he has a little bit of opening here.  So far as we are
    57        concerned, the leaflet does not say that McDonald's has
    58        sacked anybody at all.  It says -----
    59
    60   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Look at the bottom of the left-hand column.

Prev Next Index