Day 304 - 22 Nov 96 - Page 07


     
     1        I think you should note that that actually came up with the
     2        dispute with Mike Soriano, and it is quite amazing really
     3        that disputes in two places so far away both in distance
     4        and in time, you know, McDonald's put forward the same
     5        argument, the same line on both occasions.  Then,
     6        obviously, there was a repeat pattern with all the social
     7        events and improvement in conditions and so on at the
     8        stores where unionisation was being attempted; effectively,
     9        trying to buy off the employees and persuade them that
    10        things were not as bad as they thought and they did not
    11        need a union.
    12
    13        The other general point, I think actually Mr. Morris said
    14        this, is that it is worth bearing in mind that Colchester
    15        was the Store of the Year, so the practices there were
    16        obviously considered to be the best practices as far as the
    17        Company was concerned.
    18
    19   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Is that the way round it is?   Because, even
    20        on your own evidence, it seems one pretty soon reaches a
    21        level of management where there is no suggestion that
    22        anyone above that knew what was going on.  I thought your
    23        case was, rather, that the insistence on cutting costs
    24        would lead ordinary people to do what they did.
    25
    26   MS. STEEL:   I think there is a bit of both, to be honest.  Yes,
    27        I think there has to be.  All right, the higher levels of
    28        management may not know every single thing that is going
    29        on, but they must be aware that there has to be cutting of
    30        corners, and so on, in order to achieve these results.
    31        They could quite easily look into it and do something about
    32        it.
    33
    34        In terms of pay, some final points about pay.  Just that it
    35        should be borne in mind that if the Plaintiffs are going to
    36        stick to their argument that, for example, Mr. Alimi was
    37        being paid enough money and was not being illegally
    38        underpaid because he was not getting any added overtime
    39        rate on top of his basic hours, if they are going to argue
    40        that it was not illegal because he was already getting
    41        higher rates because of the premium and because of his
    42        performance rating, then that negates their argument about
    43        how the minimum, the starting level of pay rises rapidly.
    44
    45        Obviously, we say it does not rise rapidly in any event,
    46        but it is quite clear that, if they are going to stick to
    47        the argument they are advancing, they are clawing back
    48        anything that the worker does achieve through having a
    49        higher than expected performance and through working
    50        antisocial hours.  So McDonald's average pay rates, which 
    51        they quote, they say you should not take the starting pay 
    52        rates, you should take the average pay rates; so their 
    53        average pay rates would be out because of that, because
    54        people would not be getting those basic rates; they would
    55        be being clawed back to pay for their overtime.
    56
    57   MR. MORRIS:   On that subject, there was one thing I was going
    58        to say, which is that up to the time when under-18s were
    59        not allowed to work after ten or twelve at night, for
    60        example, especially women, they would not have been able to

Prev Next Index