\*Ver. 14. \\And he called the name of the first Jemima\\, &c.] That is, the name of the first and eldest daughter was called by Job Jemima; which either signifies %day%, so the Targum interprets it, and most do, and so is the same with Diana; or, as Spanheim {u} observes, it may be the same with the Arabic word %jemama%, which signifies a turtle or dove {w}; and who also observes that a country in Arabia is so called, and perhaps from her; and which seems to be confirmed by the Arabic geographer {x}, who speaks of a queen called Jamama, who dwelt in a city of the country he describes as being on the north of Arabia Felix, and also speaks of a way from thence to Bozrah in Edom; \*\\and the name of the second, Kezia\\; or Cassia; an aromatic herb of a very fragrant smell, as we render the word, \\#Ps 45:8\\; and from this person the above learned writer conjectures Mount Casius in Arabia might have its name; \*\\and the name of the third, Kerenhappuch\\; which signifies an horn or vessel of paint, such as the eastern women used to paint their faces, particularly their eyes with, \\#Jer 4:30\\; and as Jezebel did, \\#2Ki 9:30\\; or %the ray of a precious stone%; some say the carbuncle {y} or ruby; according to the Targum, the emerald; in \\#1Ch 29:2\\, the word is rendered %glittering stones%. Now these names may have respect to Job's daughters themselves, to their external beauty, afterwards observed, so the Targum, \*"he called the "one Jemima, because her beauty was as the day; "the other he called Kezia, because she was precious "like cassia; and another he called Kerenhappuch, "because great was the brightness of the glory of her "countenance, as the emerald."\* \*The complexion of the first might be clear as a bright day, though like that but of a short continuancy; see \\#So 6:10\\; the next might have her name from the fragrancy and sweetness of her temper; and the third, as being so beautiful that she needed no paint to set her off, but was beauty and paint herself; or her beauty was as bright and dazzling as a precious stone; see \\#La 4:7\\. Or these may respect their internal qualities, virtues, and graces; being children of the day, and not of the night; having a good name, which is better than all spices; and possessed of such graces as were comparable to jewels and precious stones. Though it might be, that Job, in giving them these names, may have respect to the change of his state and condition; his first daughter he called Jemima, or %day%, because it was now day, with him: he had been in the night and darkness of adversity, temporal and spiritual, but now he enjoyed a day of prosperity, and of spiritual light and joy; the justness of his cause appeared, his righteousness was brought forth as the light, and his judgment as noonday; and the dispensations of divine Providence appeared to him in a different light than he had seen them in: his second daughter he called Kezia, or Cassia, an herb of a sweet smell, in opposition to the stench of his ulcers and of his breath, which had been so very offensive, and from which he was now free; and may denote also the recovery of his good name, better than precious ointment, in which cassia was an ingredient: his youngest daughter he called Kerenhappuch, the horn of paint, in opposition to his horn being defiled in the dust, and his face foul with weeping, \\#Job 16:15,16\\; or if Kerenhappuch signifies the horn turned, as Peritsol interprets it, it may have respect to the strange and sudden turn of Job's affairs: and it is easy to observe, that men have given names to their children on account of their present state and condition, or on account of the change of a former one; see \\#Ge 41:51,52 Ex 18:3,4\\. \*Ver. 15. \\And in all the land were no women found [so] fair as the\\ \\daughters of Job\\, &c.] Either in the whole world, which is not improbable: or it may be rather in the land or country in which they dwelt; and which may be gathered from their names, as before observed. The people of God, and children of Christ, the antitype of Job, are all fair, and there is no spot in them; a perfection of beauty, perfectly comely, through the comeliness of Christ put upon them, and are without spot or wrinkle, or any such thing; \*\\and their father gave them inheritance among their brethren\\; which was done not on account of their beauty or virtue; nor is this observed so much to show the great riches of Job, that he could give his daughters as much as his sons, as his impartiality to his children, and his strict justice and equity in distributing his substance to them all alike, making no difference between male and female. And so in Christ, the antitype of Job, there is neither male nor female, no difference between them, \\#Ga 3:28\\: but being all children, they are heirs, heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ, and equally partake of the same inheritance with the saints in light, \\#Ro 8:17 Col 1:12\\. \*Ver. 16. \\After this lived Job an hundred and forty\\, years\\, &c.] Not after he had arrived to the height of his prosperity; not after the birth of his children, and they were grown up, and had their portions given them, which must take in a considerable number of years; but after his afflictions were over, and his prosperity began: and if his years were doubled, as some think, though that is not certain, then he must be seventy years of age when he was so sorely afflicted and must live to the age of two hundred and ten; which is the common notion of the Jewish writers {z}: however, he must be fifty or sixty years of age at that time, since his former children were grown up and were for themselves; and it is said {a}, his afflictions continued seven years. So that it is not at all improbable that he lived to be about two hundred years of age; and which was a singular blessing of God to him, if you compare his age with that of Jacob, Joseph, Moses, and Joshua, between the two former and the two latter he may be supposed to live; \*\\and saw his sons, and his sons' sons, [even] four generations\\; Joseph saw but the third, Job the fourth, he was a great-great-grandfather. This was no doubt a pleasant sight to him, to see such a numerous offspring descending from him; and especially if they were walking in the ways of God, as probably they were, since no doubt he would take all the care of their education that in him lay. This is the great blessing promised to the Messiah, the antitype of Job, \\#Isa 53:10\\; see also \\#Isa 59:21\\. {u} Hist. Jobi, c. 12. s. 7. {w} Golii Lexic. Arab. col. 2767, 2768. {x} Geograph. Nub. Climat. 2. par. 6. {y} Hiller. Onomastic. Sacr. p. 356. {z} T. Bava Bathra, fol. 15. 1. Seder Olam Rabba, c. 3. {a} Suidas in voce \~iwb\~.