430 OF THE SEPARATE STATE OF THE SOUL. BOoK VII. have been at a loss what choice to have made, whether to live or die; whether to depart out of the world, or to continue in it; he could have easily discerned, that it was his interest to abide in the flesh, or in the present state, in which he received much good for himself, and did much for others; whereas, if he was not to enter upon a state of happiness until the resurrection, but remain unactive and useless; it certainly was much more eligible to continue as he was. For,. -4. Most certain it is, that it would have been better for the churches of Christ, for the interest of religion, and for the-glory of God, if he had remained ou earth to this day, and so on to the second coming of Christ, than to be sleeping in his grave, receiving no benefit to himself, nor being of any use to others. 7thly, From Rev. xiv. 13. Blessed are the dead which die in the Lord, &c.. . .. By the dead that dic' in the Lord, are not meant merely, or only, the martyrs of Jesus, who die for the sake of Christ, and his gospel; but all the saints who die in union with Christ, in faith in him, as the only Saviour and Redeemer; in hope of eternal life by him; and in expectation of being for ever with him; and whose faith, hope, and expectation, will not fail, nor be disappointed. 2. Truly good men are blessed now; they are blessed who trust in the Lord, and make him their hope; they are happy who dwell in his house, enjoy his ordinances, and are employed in his service; who walk in his ways, and keep his commandments: but they are much more blessed at death; which would not be their case, if the did not immediately enter into the presence of and into the joy of the Lord. And, 3. This is the blessedness inteuded here; for it commences from .henceforth, from the instant of their death; and which is confirmed by the testimony of the Spirit; Yea, saith the Spirit; he says, they are blessed from that time; which blessedness,.. 4. Lies in a rest from their labours; not merely in a rest from the labours of their bodies, much less in a cessation from the spiritual exercises of their souls; but in inward everlasting peace, joy, and comfort; and in their works following' them, not only what they had done as witnesses of the truth of grace, but what they were to do, and be em- ployed in, until the coming of Christ; which leads to con-ider the proof that may be given, Secondly, That the souls of men, when separated from theii' bodies by death, are not in a state otinsen- sibility and inactivity. There are some, who, though they do not deny the immortality of the soul, yet think it sleeps with the body until the resurrection; and this was the firm opinion of Soeinus, as he him- self says {}, that the soul of man, after this life, does not so Subsist of itself, as to be sensible either of re- wards or punishments; or, indeed, as to be capable of perceiving those things; and the same is held by some Arminian writers {2}. But in opposition to this notion, and some that Calvin calls Catabaptists, and who go by the name of soui-sleepers with usa, 1st, I shall endearour to prove, that the soul is operative, and in a state of action, when separate from the body; and that insensibility is not to be con. eluded from the absence of the body. For, 1. The soul can and does operate without the use of bodily organs in its present state, and in many things st, ands in no need of them; the rational soul thiks, discourses, and reasons without the u.,e of them; its powers and facultics, the understanding and will, need them not; the will is directed and guided by the un- derstanding; and the understanding has to do with objects in the consideration of which bodily organs are no ways assisting; as in the consideration of God, his nature and perfections; of angels and spirits, and their nature; and of a man's own spirit, and the things of it, which it penetrates into without the help of any of the instruments of the body: it can consider of things past long ago, and of things very remote and at a great distance; and such objects as are presented to it by the senses, it reasons about them without .making use of any of the organs of the body; and if it can operate without the body, it can exist without it; for since it is independent of it in its operations, it is independent of it in its being; and as it can exist without it, it can act in that separate state of' existence without it: wherefore since it dies not with the body, it is not affected as to its operations by the absence of it, nor at death becomes insensible as that is... 2. The case of persons in raptures, ecstasies and trances, when the body is senseless and inactive, and as if it was dead, and yet the soul is active and attentive, and capable of receiving things communicated to it, shews most clearly the soul can operate without the body; and if in this state, much more in a more perfect one. The apostle John was in the spirit, in an ecstasy, when he saw and heard the various things recorded in the Book of the Revelation; the case of the apostle Paul is very remarkable, a particular account of which he gives, though not knowing whether in the body or out of it, '2 Cot. xii. 2--4. now though the apostle was not certain whether his soul was in his body or not, during his rapture; yet this appears most certain, that it was his sentiment that a soul out of the body is capable of seeing such things as he did; or otherwise it would have been no difficulty with him to have de- termined whether he was in or out of the body; for if he could not hear and see such things as he did out of the body, then he must without all doubt be in the body when he heard and saw. them; but his way of speaking clearly shews that he thought his soul was capable of attending to these things, though it might be out of it; and if this is the same with the trance re- corded in Acts xxii. 17--21. as some think, it appears that while he was in it, and his body lay senseless and unactive, his soul had a sight of Christ, and a conver- sation with him, and received a mission from him to the Gentiles. Now if the soul is not in a state of in- sensibility when the body sometimes now is, there is no reason to believe it is in such a state when the body is dead and separated from it; since the body in an ecstasy is of no more use to it, nor the organs of it, than if it was dead. 3. The soul, freed from the Socin. Epist. 5. ad Volkelium inter opera ejus, tom. 1. p. 454. Vid. Peltii. Harmon. Remonstrant. et Socin. art. '22. paragraph. S. p. S58. Calvin. Assertin non dotmire sed vivere, &c. fol. til.