| From: | Neil Bothwick |
| Date: | 1 Aug 2000 at 13:24:54 |
| Subject: | Re: Amiga Active 11 |
Michael O'Hara said,
> Online : started reading, thought it was a bit of a repeat of the spam
> article in CU which I memorised. :)
It wasn't. There was some overlap of course, because it was on the same
subject, but the treatment was different. Also, as has been said many
times, Amiga Active is not CU. You can't refuse to deal with a subject
just because a different magazine did. Should we also refuse to cover
anything that AF did, considering that at least four of the current AA
writers have also written for AF as well as CU.
There was another reason for covering it again. The CU article was
written over two years ago, when there were far less Amiga users online.
It was written before the subscription-free ISPs started. A lot of
people may well have skipped the CU article because it was then of no
interest to them.
Remember that I posted here several times asking for suggestions for
Online topics. You had a chance to influence my choice of subject then
and chose not to take it.
If you don't tell us what you want, how can we give you what you want?
> Unlike those I have talked to who no longer buy AA, I tried to give some
> feedback re issue 10.
Unfortunately, most of your feedback has been negative. Instead of
telling us what you don't want, tell us what you do want.
Neil
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails