| From: | darren glenn |
| Date: | 9 Aug 2000 at 20:43:53 |
| Subject: | Re Powerport+ Vs Goldsurfer/hypercom z+ desktop |
On the 9th August Simon Preston wrote:
>So Chris Green, you vish to know about RE: [amigactive] Powerport+ Vs
>Goldsurfer/hypercom z+ desktop? Vell, I will tell you...
>
>>> What I want to know is which card is best out of the powerport and the
>>> goldsurfer. And if it is the powerport is it worth paying the extra £20
>
>> PowerPort? I take it this is another name for an existing card, can
anyone
>> translate?
>
> Nope. The Powerport is as the name is. It was one of the first A1200 clock
>cards and had 1 25 pin serial, 1 9pin serial and 1 (unused) parallel port.
What does unused mean? Does it mean there isn't really a parallel port on it
then?
I would like a card like this so that I can plug my modem in one serial
port, my nullmodem in the other and my printer in the parallel port.
Thanks to everone who has already replied to me but I am still a little
confused.
I'd love to, but I have to study for a blood test.
---------------------------------------------
mailto:Dazzie@glenn1000.freeserve.co.uk
AIM: Dazzie1000
ICQ: 77752381
IRC: Dazzie
http://www.glenn1000.freeserve.co.uk/
---------------------------------------------
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails