| From: | Matthew Garrett |
| Date: | 10 Aug 2000 at 10:04:41 |
| Subject: | Re: Talkin to computers |
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 01:29:15AM +0100, Martin Nicholson wrote:
> By who's definition? Dyslexics may not be normal, i.e., be in the
> majority, with regards with their reading and writing abilities, but
> they are normal in every other sense. If we accept the implication of
> your apparent definition of "normal", then we would be diqualifying
> people left, right, and centre, for all manner of things; just because
> they were in a minority.
Is not being normal a bad thing?
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails