| From: | Rudi Chiarito |
| Date: | 31 Aug 2000 at 22:11:09 |
| Subject: | Re: AMIOPEN: vpcc as a C++ compiler |
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 09:33:01PM +0100, Matthew J Fletcher wrote:
> Talk about duplication of effort !!, anyway...
I started with your sources from the CVS server. When I realized there
were files whose case was not certain because of the WinCVS problem, I
decided to download the sources from IBM's site. As far as I recall the
Changelog in the version you used stopped at January or February, so it
seemed a good idea to use the latest instead. That turned out to be a
very good idead indeed, because the new version compiles with less
problems (ie needs less modifications) with Elate. E.g. the bizarre error
"'Hello.java' has no .java suffix" was no longer there, without having
touched a single line. ;)
> > Could you mail me that file?
> I allready did ! (you said it had been passed on),.. if you have lost it
> or i did not send it correctly, i will dig it out again.
I can't find your mail, but then in those days I lost mails because of a
(now fixed) bug in mutt. It's also true that there's no trace of any such
files sent from here in those days (the bug didn't affect the mail I had
sent). Maybe that was another file?
Anyway, I wrote:
> redeclarations? Could you mail the .c file (and any
> includes) privately to me?
Ooops. In such cases it's probably better to pass the code through the
preprocessor and then send that. Otherwise one risks missing .h files.
vpcc -E bug.c -o bug.i