| From: | Martin Steigerwald |
| Date: | 12 Aug 2000 at 00:26:44 |
| Subject: | Re: SFS |
Eddie Keller <eddiek@post.cybercity.dk> wrote on Fri, 11 Aug 2000 22:06:37 +0100 about
"[amigaOS3_5] Re: SFS" in <yam8258.1887.142821152@vip.cybercity.dk>:
> We have been using SFS for years on WB 3.0, 3.1 and now 3.5 - on original
> A4000 AT interface, on scsi 2 (Fastlane) and scsi 3 FW (CyberstormPPC) and
> on FastATA, with no problems - but remember to have a (new) backup. We have
> about 100 Gb harddisk on our Amiga.
Hi!
I usually install SFS on every Amiga I can get hands on:
Two Amigas at H&P - running stable since then, no data loss -, my own
Amiga since way ealier versions of SFS - where it wasn't that stable
all the time ;-) - two Amiga 1200 at a youth club, where children do a
reset once in a while without looking to closely at the hard drive
LED. ;-)
Unfortunately there was no time to install it on the pre-installed
Amiga 1200 used for the internet cafe at Cologne 1998. They were
running FFS and we lost more than two machines... it was easy enough
to use Envoy to play a backup back, but SFS would have saved a lot of
hassle I am sure.
Oh well I am a filing system fetischist anyway, I know both PFS and
SFS since (almost) their beginning... and then that great Fat95 for
Windows 95 disks... well if there is a filesystem be sure that I try
it, at least once ;)
Unless otherwise stated, my posts represent my
personal opinions and not necessarily those of my employer.
Please email me personally only if really necessary. Use
"AmigaOS-Support: ..." or "AOS-Support: ..." as subject.