| From: | philippe.socias |
| Date: | 14 Sep 2000 at 13:12:59 |
| Subject: | RE: AMIOPEN: Re: |
Matthew wrote ...
...
> >Are we going RPC, Jini, CORBA, something new ?
> >I hope we may use industry standard ways of distributing
> objects, so we
> can
> >communicate with others;
> >but I mostly hope that there will be a Ami way of doing it,
> as it may be
> >much more efficient.
>
> CORBA wraps all the above, it can do RPC or java bridges, or
> DCOM bridges
> its multiplatform and platform indipendent. Plus its an open excepted
> standard, you cant do much better than a good CORBA implementation.
OK, then, are we going TAO, MICO, Orbit
or one of the expensive commercial CORBA busses like Orbix or VisiBroker
or even worse, the BEA one (personal taste, don't flame me please) ?
> If amiga try and make there own they will just be were the
> OMG (people
> behind corba) were 5 years ago.
>
> Why re-invent the weel, when you can do an optimised
> implmentation of it.
...
I am not sure that Amiga as time and money to spend on writing their own
CORBA bus.
I think they will use an existing one
or no CORBA bus (then this would be 'an Ami way' of distributing objects).
So, back to my first concern,
when is information about the distributed environment going to be disclosed
?
(I should maybe open a new thread for this, sorry)
Subscribe/Unsubscribe: open-request@amiga.com
Amiga FAQ: http://www.amiga.com/faq.html