| From: | Alan Buxey |
| Date: | 14 Mar 2001 at 10:58:42 |
| Subject: | Re: CacheCDFS vs. IDEFIX97 |
hi,
> I'll stick to scsi.device then. This has always been a source of
> misunderstanding on the Amiga.
scsi.device on > OS3.1 (ie 3.5 and 3.9) has all the bits for 4xIDE
control that you need
> will not pay £15 for it. It's far too unstable. Let's say I mount a drive on
> boot, and that drive don't exist it corrupts the CVision gfx-output.
really? i havent had that problem
> However, using IDE-devices is just a temporary solution to install Debian
> from the AA18CD. (Which by the way still didn't work...*sigh*). It would be
> much simpler if APUS supported the onboard SCSI controller on CSPPC.
it would be nice if some people with CSPPCs could actually HELP with the
development of the driver! (too many people expecting everything for
nothing...this isnt AmigaOS. Linux only exists because people develop it.
drivers only exist if someone writes them)
now you have a working Debian on your Amiga you could help the CSPPC-SCSI
problem ;-)
alan
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Make good on the promise you made at graduation to keep
in touch. Classmates.com has over 14 million registered
high school alumni--chances are you'll find your friends!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/l3joGB/DMUCAA/4ihDAA/d8AVlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/