AmigaActive (1676/2347)

From:Don Cox
Date:21 Mar 2001 at 23:08:01
Subject:Re: slow

On 21-Mar-01, Bill Eaves wrote:
> Hello Don
>
> I get similar output from setpatch but without the additional stuff
> you show below.
>
>
> My question is: does the below justify the extra boot time caused by
> the reset ? Do I /need/ updated console.device, ram handler etc. the
> older ones seem to still work perfectly.

These discussions are the result of H&P's stupid decision to not publish
a list of the bug fixes. My information is that there are lots of bug
fixes.

> Is it not a backwards step, I remember the days when you switched on a
> computer and could use it almost immediately without all this
> rigmorole.

If it was practical to sell updated ROMs, or if Jens Schonfeld could
bring out his Flash ROM adaptor, you could go back to a simple boot up.

AFAIK there are no supplies of that type of ROM around now. You could
nag Jens at Individual Computers. One would have to make a snapshot of
the patched ROM while the Amiga was running, write it to the Flash ROM,
and that would give a single boot.

Personally, I don't find the double boot a major annoyance. What was
annoying was the Magic Workbench demon making an unexpected loud noise
at random occasions. I'm really glad that's gone in 3.9

Regards



Don Cox
doncox@enterprise.net

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Make good on the promise you made at graduation to keep
in touch. Classmates.com has over 14 million registered
high school alumni--chances are you'll find your friends!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/n4HqaC/DMUCAA/4ihDAA/d8AVlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/