| From: | Stephen Pike |
| Date: | 28 Mar 2001 at 18:34:49 |
| Subject: | Re: CacheCDFS vs. IDEFIX97 |
Hi ,
On 06-Mar-01, you wrote:
> Dan G. Lunde said,
>
>> I have OS3.9 and therefore a licensed CacheCDFS. However each time I
>> access the atapi.device I get the *very* annoying "Demo version only,
>> please buy blah, blah, blah" from IDEFIX97.
>
> Don't use atapi.device with OS 3.5/9, use scsi.device.
So why should you not use atapi.device?
I'm using atapi.device with OS3.5 and have no problem with my IDEfix97
or IDE drives!
Regards, Steve
A member of G.A.G - Gloucestershire Amiga Group.
On an A1200 030 Running OS3.5 ICQ 98139263
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Secure your servers with 128-bit SSL encryption!
Grab your copy of VeriSign's FREE Guide,
"Securing Your Web site for Business." Get it now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KVNB7A/e.WCAA/bT0EAA/d8AVlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/