| From: | Matt Sealey |
| Date: | 6 Mar 2001 at 20:16:36 |
| Subject: | Re: CacheCDFS vs. IDEFIX97 |
Hello Dave
On 06-Mar-01, you wrote:
>> MS Don't use atapi.device - you don't have a licensed IDEfix (you don't
>> MS actually have a "licensed" CacheCDFS either to be honest) and that's
>> MS what's causing the nag requesters to appear.
>
> Er, I thought CacheCDFS had become part of the OS after 3.9. I own both
> (3.9 and IDEFIX) but I kinda imagined cacheCDFS was mine twice?
It's installed with the OS, but that doesn't mean you're "licensed" with it.
You actually own licenses for OS3.9 and IDEfix'97, not for individual
components therein. For instance, you couldn't sell your Cachecdfs
binary to someone else without selling either the whole lot of either
package..
Thanks
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/