| From: | Dave Naylor |
| Date: | 6 Mar 2001 at 20:20:47 |
| Subject: | Re: CacheCDFS vs. IDEFIX97 |
Hiya Matt
On 06-Mar-01, you wrote about "[amigactive] Re: CacheCDFS vs. IDEFIX97"
>MS> Er, I thought CacheCDFS had become part of the OS after 3.9. I own both
>MS> (3.9 and IDEFIX) but I kinda imagined cacheCDFS was mine twice?
>MS It's installed with the OS, but that doesn't mean you're "licensed" with
>MS it.
>MS You actually own licenses for OS3.9 and IDEfix'97, not for individual
>MS components therein. For instance, you couldn't sell your Cachecdfs
>MS binary to someone else without selling either the whole lot of either
>MS package..
<sigh> I was reading the Open Source / Free Software thing in Linux
Magazine today - why cant we be that compli, er, simple :)
Cheerio
O Dave Naylor [ All your base are belong to us ]
<|> [ This boy has broken down ]
|---| ICQ 16742766 [ http://www.chipsngravy.co.uk ]
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/