| From: | |
| Date: | 09 Feb 2001 at 19:08:00 |
| Subject: | Re: Alloc/Free___ Chip memory fragmentation |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gabriele Svelto" <jlpicard@tiscalinet.it>
To: <amiga-c@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 9:57 AM
Subject: [amiga-c] Re: Alloc/Free___ Chip memory fragment
> Hi Rod,
> > > Better get MuForce instead of enforcer (from MMULib.lha on Aminet),
it's
> > > based on the latest Enforcer sources plus it has more features and
works
> > > with mmu.library which is a really cool thing.
> >
> > Plus it's dead slow on an 040 and it'd be even slower on an 030...
>
> Curious, probably you have not configured it properly, I
> run it all the time and it gives me 0 overhead if there
> aren't any hits and when there are one just the overhead
> of writing to the serial port. It gets slow as hell when
> mmu.library is badly configured but this happens only if
> you mess with the standard config file. See ya
>
I tried MuForce once, both with standard options on and with minimal options
on... Never messed with mmu.library options at all. It slowed the system
down so much I was reminded of working with a plain 68000. That was when
there were no hits, it got even slower if there were hits. Similar results
with GaurdianAngel. However, that was a while back, maybe they and/or
mmu.library have improved since then. Regardless, I'll stick with enforcer
and Mungwall. They've allways worked well for me.
Regards Rod
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/451227/_/981742097/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->