| From: | Andy Hall |
| Date: | 19 Apr 2001 at 22:50:20 |
| Subject: | Re: Voyager Image Decoders |
Hello Matt
On 19-Apr-01, you wrote:
>> But can you say it is fully functioning as from the current public beta,
>> without non-public MUI 3.9beta?
>
> Yep. I flip back and forth between 3.8 and 3.9 regularly. The only
> differences are aesthetics and speed in reality, MUI 3.8 is remarkably
> free of bugs.
But fully functioning? As in a complete solution, all featues there.
> So Voyager is worse at dithering certain things than others. Datatypes
> would not cure this by any means, nor would PPC datatypes. Neither would
> some miraculous thing OTHER than getting a 16bit display.
So your statement that voyager if far better than Ibrowse for image decoding
was not correct then. I agree that datatypes aren't the solution at the
moment. But you said that Ibrowse has poor dithering which it doesn't.
Although all this is irrelevant because everyone should be going PPC and
getting a graphics card soon when OS4 and MorphOS. :-)
Regards
=========Powered By Amiga=========
== A1200T/040@28 18Mb 4.3Gb HDD ==
==================================
http://www.jgen.fsnet.co.uk
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Do you have 128-bit SSL encryption server security?
Get VeriSign's FREE Guide, "Securing Your
Web Site for Business." Get it now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/EVNB7A/c.WCAA/bT0EAA/d8AVlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/