| From: | Steve Hodson |
| Date: | 22 Apr 2001 at 20:38:26 |
| Subject: | Re: Common misconception (was Re: Voyager Image Decoders) |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Cox" <doncox@enterprise.net>
To: <amigactive@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2001 10:58 AM
Subject: [amigactive] Re: Common misconception (was Re: Voyager Image
Decoders)
> On 22-Apr-01, Matt Sealey wrote:
>
> > Stuntzi didn't want MUI in there because he didn't want it in a slack
> > hacky superficial OS upgrade like OS3.5 - especially since before
> > OS3.5 was even re-activated under Gateway's little regime, MorphOS was
> > in active development..
>
> However, although 3.5 was pretty rough, 3.9 is really rather good.
> Thanks mainly to all the bug fixes by Olaf and others.
Agreed..3.9 is what 3.5 should`ve been..but we all knew 3.5 had to happen to
make 3.9, so it`s rather a moot point eh?
On a more serious note - isn`t there enough of a confusion abut UI toolkits
avaialble for AOS (in no order other than random thought):
1., BGUI
2. Classact
3. Reaction
4. Gadtools
5. MUI
6. etceteras
On a par with X (linux) ..?
Steve
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/