From: | dave |
Date: | 26 Apr 2001 at 10:40:10 |
Subject: | Re: PFS3 format probs |
--- In amigactive@y..., "Neil Bothwick" <neil@w...> wrote:
> >> You're not using the OS 3.5 scsi.device, you're using the Elbox
> >> scsi.device, try the direct SCSI version.
>
> > My disk is set up as one large disk. I am using the OS3.5
> > scsi.device (v43.35 or something) because I don't run the Elbox
> > software at all
>
> The OS scsi.device is for the internal IDE port. Anything connected
> to the PowerFlyer will be using the Elbox scsi.device, which is
> contained in the PF's ROM.
It's not a PowerFlyer though, it's just the plain 4 way buffered
interface which connects to the internal IDE port and nothing else.
I'm sure the Elbox scsi.device isn't in ROM, because if you don't run
the 4xEIDE99 program (or whatever it's called) at the top of the s-s
and do a "version scsi.device" you get whatever version the OS
supplies. Running the 4xEIDE program and then doing the same version,
you get the Elbox version number which IIRC is something like v44.10.
If the scsi.device I'm using wasn't working as TD64 compatible then
surely using the areas of the disk between 4->8Gb would have wrapped
around and destroyed what's at the start of the disk? (And I never had
that problem.)
> If that device isn't TD64 compatible, you'll need to use the direct
> SCSI version of PFS3.
Thanks. It does seem like I'll need to use the direct scsi version,
but it's strange why it wouldn't like my interface/OS scsi.device.
Actually, given the amount of different implementations of IDE it's
not strange at all :\
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/