| From: | Neil Bothwick |
| Date: | 2 Apr 2001 at 09:18:47 |
| Subject: | Re: CacheCDFS vs. IDEFIX97 |
Stephen Pike said,
>>> I have OS3.9 and therefore a licensed CacheCDFS. However each time I
>>> access the atapi.device I get the *very* annoying "Demo version only,
>>> please buy blah, blah, blah" from IDEFIX97.
>>
>> Don't use atapi.device with OS 3.5/9, use scsi.device.
> So why should you not use atapi.device?
Because you get the shareware requester if you haven't registered
IDEFix. atapi.device is par of IDEFix, not OS 3.5+.
> I'm using atapi.device with OS3.5 and have no problem with my IDEfix97
> or IDE drives!
Because you've registered?
Neil
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Secure your servers with 128-bit SSL encryption!
Grab your copy of VeriSign's FREE Guide,
"Securing Your Web site for Business." Get it now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/4cW4jC/e.WCAA/bT0EAA/d8AVlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/