| From: | Matt Sealey |
| Date: | 18 Apr 2001 at 14:55:15 |
| Subject: | Re: PowerPC targeting GCC ? |
Hello paul@lagernet.clara.co.uk
On 18-Apr-01, you wrote:
> --- In amigactive@y..., Matt Sealey <matt@k...> wrote:
>>
>> If H&P did use gcc for StormC, they should (and as far as I
>> remember, did, and if they didn't then they should be shot)
>> release the source code differences to it and then you could
>> just get the appropriate gcc base sources and apply them,
>> then compile it with your working gcc 68k base.
>
> And then delete StormC and use CED & a Makefile :-)
Who said anything about getting StormC? That would be stupid.
I just said GET THE SOURCE DIFFERENCES AND COMPILE THEM WITh
THE GCC YOU ALREADY HAVE.
With just gcc, you'd HAVE to use a texteditor and a proper makefile.
Why must people agree with me in such an opposing tone? It's quite
disconcerting :)
>> It'd take about a week to compile on and for 68k, and then another
>> week to get your 68k version of gcc that targets PPC to compile a
>> PPC version of gcc that targets PPC before you can do anything,
>> but.. :P
>
> Actually it only takes a couple of hours for a 68k build. Maybe
> less.
My experience with the GeekGadgets 68k is that it tends to nuke
ixemul if you do more than simple tasks. A week of f**king around
trying to make dependencies and rebooting, and starting again,
and rebooting, and then screaming.. :)
H&P's version might be more stable (it doesn't use ixemul for a
start) but you first.. have.. to.. compile.. it! (Nooooo!!!)
SAS/C forever ;)
Thanks
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Do you have 128-bit SSL encryption server security?
Get VeriSign's FREE Guide, "Securing Your
Web Site for Business." Get it now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2cW4jC/c.WCAA/bT0EAA/d8AVlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/