From: | Andy Hall |
Date: | 18 Apr 2001 at 19:32:17 |
Subject: | Re: Voyager Image Decoders |
Hello Matt
On 18-Apr-01, you wrote:
> Which are all ways of spreading pixels in defined patterns (either
> using crosshatching, different sized blobs, or error values) to give
> the imression of colours you don't have.
It does help if it gives you the impression of the right colour.
> Isn't that what I said? Voyager's FS algorithm is top-notch for
> quality images.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Yeah right! Whatever you say.
>>> It is NOT placing pixels in a fuzzy mess so that if you squint then it
>>> MIGHT be that colour if you wished and wished, or looks like good
>>> dithering on a 14" TV screen.
>
> ^^ which is what IBrowse does. Or seemingly so ;)
Well you would say that wouldn't you? It's pretty sad that you feel the
need to slag off a rival just because your insecure about them. You don't
get anyone on this list who work (or is that now worked?) on Ibrowse coming
on here and listing everything that Voyager does badly, do you?
Regards
=========Powered By Amiga=========
== A1200T/040@28 18Mb 4.3Gb HDD ==
==================================
http://www.jgen.fsnet.co.uk
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Secure your servers with 128-bit SSL encryption!
Grab your copy of VeriSign's FREE Guide,
"Securing Your Web site for Business." Get it now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KVNB7A/e.WCAA/bT0EAA/d8AVlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/