From: | Jan-Erik Karlsson |
Date: | 18 Apr 2001 at 21:42:04 |
Subject: | Re: Voyager Image Decoders |
Hello, Matt
On 18-Apr-01, you wrote:
MS > Hello Jan-Erik
MS >
MS > On 18-Apr-01, you wrote:
MS >
MS >> Hello
MS >>
MS >> I don't think that image quality is that important on a web browser
MS >> (it ain't a image processor you're using)
MS >>
MS >> what's good with datatype's is simply that you can show ALL pictures
MS >> inline not only those that the current image decoders support (which
MS >> really is exactly opposit to what the amiga is about)
MS >
MS > It is also the exact opposite of what the internet is all about. If you
MS > start embedding ILBM, PCD, or BMP images in webpages you ought to be
MS > SHOT.
MS >
MS > Any browser that goes ahead and endorses such an approach ought to
MS > be SHOT.
go ahead and shoot MicroSoft, Netscape etc. (make my day)
With kind regards,
Jan-Erik Karlsson
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Secure your servers with 128-bit SSL encryption!
Grab your copy of VeriSign's FREE Guide,
"Securing Your Web site for Business." Get it now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KVNB7A/e.WCAA/bT0EAA/d8AVlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/