| From: | Andrew Crowe |
| Date: | 18 Apr 2001 at 22:14:32 |
| Subject: | Re: Voyager Image Decoders |
Hi Everybody,
> http://www.niblet.co.uk/manta.png
>
> I circled the bits where each browser does best. So IBrowse is
> better at dithering parts of the image where the colours are very
> similar - white to not-so-white gradients. But the image quality,
> and range of colours used, is generally better with V. Glows and
> faded portions are generally of better quality.
>
> I still think the grainy IBrowse decoding is to it's disadvantage.
Oh really, prehaps you'd like to take a look at this photo, rendered
in both browsers, I rest my case :)
http://mantasoft.tripod.com/compare.gif
(Actually there's another shortfall of V's, this photo was originally
twice as big, but Voyager couldn't display it so I had to halve it)
But I guess in the end it depends what you're looking at, V handles
block colour better, iBrowse handles things like photo's better.
See ya :)
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Do you have 128-bit SSL encryption server security?
Get VeriSign's FREE Guide, "Securing Your
Web Site for Business." Get it now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2cW4jC/c.WCAA/bT0EAA/d8AVlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/