From: | Chris Millar |
Date: | 28 May 2001 at 16:20:18 |
Subject: | Re: PFS3 |
Hello Bob
On 28-May-01, you wrote:
>> FFS uses a complete filesystem block for the headers and directory
>> information for each file. With a 1024K block size, a 1 byte file still
>> uses 2K of disk space. PFS keeps this data far more efficiently, so you
>> end up with more usable disk space.
>
> So..... everything is as it should be? Thanks for that, now I can do my
> other partitions & drives.
> Do you suggest leaving anything as FFS I wonder? For any reason?
Yes.....for safety reasons.
I had 2 hard drives, one 13Gb & the other 30Gb, all partitions were PFS3
formatted.
PFS3 has failed on both drives, and now both drives can only be used as
door-stops.
I sent an email requesting support a week ago, but I`m still waiting for a
reply. But I`m pretty sure all development has stopped so.......I`m up a
certain creek without a forward-motion-implement. :(
Yes FFS has it`s faults but at least it doesn`t wreck your HD`(s).
Slainte Mhath,
Chris
ICQ - 64510899
Powered by PowerPC Amiga in Dumfries & Galloway
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/