| From: | Alan Buxey |
| Date: | 29 May 2001 at 16:17:52 |
| Subject: | Re: PFS3 |
hi,
> Used above settings successfully but am concerned about loss of space.
> 500mb available on FFS reduced to around 472mb just through using PFS3,
> seems ridiculous. That's around 6% unavailable.
ah! but you are looking at short-term. PFS3 allocates its required
database space at the beginning....whereas FFS will use FAR MORE than that
space as you slowly fill the drive up.
alan
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/