| From: | Don Cox |
| Date: | 8 Aug 2001 at 10:32:04 |
| Subject: | Re: Digital Cameras |
On 07-Aug-01, Richard Friend wrote:
> I have a 35mm SLR camera as well and to be truthful, there's not much
> difference between what the DC215 and printer produce against the SLR
> and boots processing!
If by "Boots processing" you mean badly printed enprints, there wouldn't
be. I was thinking of prints of around 20x16 inches made with a top
class enlarging lens, or transparencies projected with a Leitz
projector. I guess you haven't seen what 35mm can do.
If there is no camera shake, your 35mm negatives probably hold much
finer detail than you have seen.
> On it's highest quality setting the DC215 is
> fine, it's pictures print out as good as the SLR. Most of my pictures,
> however, end up on cd's for friends to view on their computers. This
> means that high quality hi-res pictures merely come out massive on a
> computer screen!
The computer screen is a very low resolution device, even compared to an
inkjet printer.
Regards
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Small business owners...
Tell us what you think!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/vO1FAB/txzCAA/ySSFAA/dpFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
To unsubscribe mailto:amigactive-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Anyone sending unsubscribe messages to the list will be SHOT!
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/