| From: | Richard Friend |
| Date: | 9 Aug 2001 at 21:12:22 |
| Subject: | Re: Digital Cameras |
----- Original Message -----
From: Don Cox <doncox@enterprise.net>
>
> If by "Boots processing" you mean badly printed enprints, there wouldn't
> be. I was thinking of prints of around 20x16 inches made with a top
> class enlarging lens, or transparencies projected with a Leitz
> projector. I guess you haven't seen what 35mm can do.
>
> If there is no camera shake, your 35mm negatives probably hold much
> finer detail than you have seen.
>
Point taken! I'm just a happy snapper and my SLR is a Zenit with three extra
lenses (28mm wide angle, 128mm and a ferking great telescope jobby)
It gives great pictures under almost any conditions and by changing shutter
speed/ aperture settings can vary results with great effect but it's totally
manual and can take a minute or so to set up a picture!
The Kodak is just point and click and it if comes out wrong- delete it and
carry on!
>
> The computer screen is a very low resolution device, even compared to an
> inkjet printer.
>
Agreed, but it's easier and cheaper to give friends the files and let them
print what they want!
>
Richy
http://www.aminutz.org.uk
ICQ 18894975
mailto:richy@aminutz.org.uk
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Small business owners...
Tell us what you think!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/vO1FAB/txzCAA/ySSFAA/dpFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
To unsubscribe mailto:amigactive-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Anyone sending unsubscribe messages to the list will be SHOT!
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/