| From: | Don Cox |
| Date: | 10 Aug 2001 at 09:38:32 |
| Subject: | Re: Digital Cameras |
On 09-Aug-01, Richard Friend wrote:
>> If there is no camera shake, your 35mm negatives probably hold much
>> finer detail than you have seen.
>>
> Point taken! I'm just a happy snapper and my SLR is a Zenit with three
> extra lenses (28mm wide angle, 128mm and a ferking great telescope
> jobby) It gives great pictures under almost any conditions and by
> changing shutter speed/ aperture settings can vary results with great
> effect but it's totally manual and can take a minute or so to set up a
> picture!
The problem with the Zenit is the very rough shutter button, which
almost guarantees camera shake. Compare a camera such as the Olympus
OM-1 from around the same time. Otherwise it was a good bargain.
Fortunately, cameras don't become obsolete like computers, unless you go
back so far in time that the lenses aren't coated, which is around 65
years ago.
Regards
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Small business owners...
Tell us what you think!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/vO1FAB/txzCAA/ySSFAA/dpFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
To unsubscribe mailto:amigactive-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Anyone sending unsubscribe messages to the list will be SHOT!
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/